Studying Program Results
TEG designs rigorous evaluation studies using design parameters that consider units of analysis, sample size, anticipated outcome, propensity score matching variables, and statistical analyses to provide confidence in reaching MDES estimates.
Quasi-Experimental Design (QED)
QED is a rigorous research study that involves testing variables on specific groups without using a random pre-selection process. Each unit in the program group is matched with one or more comparison units based on known matching variables (i.e., presenting problems, demographics). Propensity Score Matching produces a unidimensional index that can be used to minimize differences across many variables considered concurrently. QED is commonly used in the field of education so that interventions are not withheld from specific groups.
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
RCT is a rigorous research study that involves testing variables on specific groups that were randomly assigned to either the treatment or control group. Units (i.e., students, teachers, classrooms, schools) are randomly assigned to a program group or a control group using a “simple” random assignment (lottery) or stratified (blocked) random assignment in which units are put in discrete groups based on common characteristics prior to being randomly assigned. RCT is more difficult to implement, but is considered the “gold” standard.
Interrupted Time Series with Comparison Group (C-SITS)
C-SITS uses post-implementation data compared at regular intervals with data collected prior to the program. Differences in slope and intercept across pre-program and post-program years are compared with differences in slope and intercept in a comparison group. This is a “difference in differences” design and is most suitable to use at the school level.
ERIC reports from The Evaluation Group
The following links will take you to summaries of impact studies that The Evaluation Group has submitted to the Institute of Education Sciences Education Resources Information Center:
- 2025 METRICS EIR Impact Study Winchester Public Schools
- 2021 GROW STEM i3 Impact Study Metro Nashville Public Schools, ERIC - ED613865 - GROW STEM: Girls and Guys Realizing Opportunities with STEM, Grantee Submission, 2021-Jun
- 2019 ACCESS i3 Impact Study Montgomery County Schools, ERIC - ED595219 - Impact Evaluation of "ACCESS": A Culture Creating Effective Systems for Success, Grantee Submission, 2019-Jun
- 2019 UNISON i3 Impact Study Take Stock in Children, ERIC - ED593732 - Impact Evaluation of "UNISON": "U"plifting "N"on-Cognitive Skills and "I"nnovation through "S"tudent "O"pportunity "N"etworks, Grantee Submission, 2019-Mar-15
- 2018 PACE i3 Impact Study United Way of Greater Atlanta, ERIC - ED591020 - Impact Evaluation of Partners Advancing Childhood Education ("PACE"), Grantee Submission, 2018-Dec
- 2018 INSPIRE i3 Impact Study Cabarrus County Schools, ERIC - ED591365 - Impact Evaluation of "INSPIRE: Infusing Innovative STEM Practices into Rigorous Education", Grantee Submission, 2018-Aug
- 2018 12 for Life i3 Impact Study Carroll County Schools, ERIC - ED584161 - Impact Evaluation of "12 for Life": Better Lives through Education and Employment, Grantee Submission, 2018-May-18
- 2015 COMPASS EIR Impact Study Iredell-Statesville Schools, ERIC - ED570355 - COMPASS: Collaborative Organizational Model to Promote Aligned Support Structures. Final Evaluation Report, Grantee Submission, 2015-Oct
What Works Clearinghouse Reports From The Evaluation Group
The following link will take you to research studies that The Evaluation Group has submitted and been published by WWC with significant results: