The Evaluation Group’s mission is two-fold:

First, to design, conduct, and disseminate high-quality program evaluations that inform decision-making and promote effective practice; and second, to be the leader at helping schools, universities, and large non-profits in the southeastern United States to obtain and use grant resources effectively and efficiently to achieve their missions.


The Evaluation Group (TEG) has over 25 years of experience in evaluating large federal, state, and foundation grant programs. We help programs articulate their underlying theories; design evaluations that maximize results without overburdening staff; identify and develop suitable instruments; create data management and collection systems that match performance requirements; analyze data using appropriate statistical techniques; and tailor our reporting to our customers' needs.


The TEG team is highly skilled in all facets of evaluation, but it’s our collaborative and very personal approach to evaluation that sets us apart. This approach demands that we invest time working alongside our clients in their work environments and school districts. Our team brings not only decades of experience to the equation, but also expertise in a wide range of specialized subject areas, including: youth development, family engagement, and public health (to name a few).

Visit our Team Page to meet our team members.




  • Camden County Schools, GA
  • Chester County Schools, SC
  • Thomaston-Upson Schools, GA
  • York School District One, SC
  • Duval County Public Schools, FL
  • Cabarrus County Schools, NC
  • Bradley County Schools, TN
  • Gaston County Schools, SC
  • Butts County Schools, GA
  • Douglas County School System, GA
  • Iredell-Statesville Schools, NC
  • Anderson District 5, SC
  • Jones County School System, GA
  • Walton County Schools, GA
  • Carroll County Schools, GA
  • Charleston County School District, SC
  • Greene County Schools, GA
  • DeKalb County Schools, GA


  • Winthrop University
  • East Tennessee State University


  • Bay State Reading Institute, MA
  • United Way of Greater Atlanta
  • Take Stock in Children, FL



Askew, K., Beverly, M. G., & Jay, M. L. (2012). Aligning collaborative and culturally responsive evaluation approaches. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(4), 552-557.

Berry, T., Murphy, K., Collins, K., Bialosiewicz, S. & Sloper, M. (2011). An Evaluation of After-School All-Stars, Los Angeles: Final Report. Institute of Organizational and Program Evaluation Research, Claremont Graduate University: Claremont, CA.

Collins, K. (2010). An Evaluation of the ShapeN’ Up and Slimmin’ Down Program: Final Report.Claremont Graduate University: Claremont, CA.

Dunet D, Gase L, Oliver M, and Schooley, M. (2012).  Evaluative Thinking: A Tool to Inform Policy Development and Policy Impact Evaluations. American Journal of Health Promotion, March.

Fisher, S., Pelt, J., Sultana, F., & Powell, L. (2007). Center for Ocean Sciences Education Excellence –SouthEast: 2006-2007 Evaluation Report. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, Office of Program Evaluation.

Holliday, L. The Benefits of Latin. Educational Research Quarterly (36.1), September, 2012.

Meece, J. L., & Askew, K. (2012). Gender, motivation, and educational attainment. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors. (Vol. 2, pp. 139-162). Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association.

Meece, J. L., Glienke, B. B., & Askew, K. (2009). Gender and motivation. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook on Motivation at School. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Oliver, Monica. 2009. Metaevaluation as a means of Means of Examining Evaluation Influence. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 6(11) 32-37.

Oliver, Monica. 2009. The Transfer Change Process. In P. Hawe and J. Ottoson, eds., Theories Of Change And Their Implications For Evaluation: Knowledge Utilization, Diffusion, Implementation, Transfer, And Translation. New Directions in Evaluation, #124, Winter.

Paranal, Rachelle, Washington, Kiona, and Derrick, Christina (2012). Utilizing Online Training for Child Sexual Abuse Prevention: Benefits and Limitations. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21 (5), 507-520.

Philp, J. D., Cearly, S C., Wright, L., and Burry, C. L. (2001). Writing for Court: An evaluation of training outcomes for child welfare workers. Training and Development in Human Services, 21 (1), pp 24-31.

Sherr, M.E., & Blumhardt, F.C. (2005). Rural Elderly Women: A triple jeopardy population. In L. Ginsbery(ed.). Social work in rural communities (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: Council on Social Work Education.

Varakin, D.A., Levin, D.T., & Collins, K. (2007). Failure to represent or failure to compare change-relevant information can cause change blindness. Perception, 36(5), 737-749.